Sepsis remains a significant clinical challenge owing to its complex pathophysiology and variable prognosis. The early identification of patients at a higher risk of poor outcomes can be crucial for improving treatment strategies. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of early serum lactate and albumin levels and the lactate/albumin (L/A) ratio for 28-day prognosis in patients with sepsis. Patients diagnosed with sepsis between January 2021 and December 2022 were evaluated using a retrospective cohort methodology. Inclusion followed the International Consensus on sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3) guidelines and patients were selected based on well-defined criteria. Variables such as lactate, albumin, and the L/A ratio were documented within the first 24 hours of admission. Statistical analyses were performed using various tools, including the nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test and receiver operating characteristic curves. A total of 301 patients were divided into the survival (n = 167) and death (n = 134) groups. Notable differences were detected in the incidence of pulmonary infection, shock, lactate, albumin, and the L/A ratio. The L/A ratio was identified as a key predictor with an area under the curve of 0.868, an optimal cutoff value of >0.17, a sensitivity of 56.21%, and a specificity of 94.18%. Significant disparities in mortality rates and survival times were observed for the lactate, albumin, and L/A levels. This study underscores the predictive value of early serum lactate and albumin levels and the L/A ratio for 28-day prognosis in patients with sepsis, with the L/A ratio showing a superior predictive capability. These findings highlight the importance of L/A ratio as a robust and precise marker for evaluating the future clinical course of patients with sepsis, potentially aiding early detection and management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: