⌘+K

Pulse Explore Communities Researchers Journals

Home Communities Explore

September 20, 2024Clinics and PracticeOpen Access

Comparative Strength Study of Indirect Permanent Restorations: 3D-Printed, Milled, and Conventional Dental Composites

João Paulo Mendes Tribst Adelheid Veerman Gabriel Kalil Rocha Pereira Cornelis J. Kleverlaan Amanda Maria de Oliveira Dal Piva

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Abstract

: Limited research has been performed to assess the strength of resin-bonded 3D-printed restorations. Based on that, this study investigates the impact of different manufacturing methods on the fracture load of indirect composite restorations (ICRs) following an aging process.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Tribst et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e57c2ab6db64358751bc3f https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract14050154

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1THREE-DIMENSIONAL (3D) PRINTED COMPOSITE INLAYS AND ONLAYS: FIT ACCURACY, MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR, AND POST-PROCESSING VARIABLES: A NARRATIVE REVIEWNarrative Review · 2025
2Comparison of physico-mechanical properties of 3D-printed resins used as permanent indirect restoration materialsOriginal Research · 2026
3Evaluation of the Mechanical and Adhesion Characteristics of Indirect Restorations Manufactured with Three-Dimensional Printing2024 · 10 citations
4Comparison Between Bond Strengths of a Resin Cement on Traditional Prosthetic Substrates and a 3D-Printed Resin for Permanent Restorations2025 · 2 citations
5Mechanical and Physical Properties of Durable Prosthetic Restorations Printed Using 3D Technology in Comparison with Hybrid Ceramics and Milled Restorations—A Systematic Review2025 · 1 citations

More related papers

Mechanical properties of dental restoration materials fabricated using 3D printing polymers and CAD/CAM hybrid blocks: a comparative study2026
Biocompatibility of printed, milled, and conventionally fabricated indirect resin-based restorative materials: an in vitro comparative study2026
Fracture resistance and mode of failure of CAD/CAM milled versus 3D-printed resin composite inlays: an in vitro study2026

More from Clinics and Practice

Dose-Informed Surgical Margin in Mandibular Osteoradionecrosis Surgery: Integrating Radiation Biology into Osteotomy PlanningMon,
Inflammatory and Metabolic Biomarkers Associated with Chronic Subdural Hematoma Recurrence: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort StudyWed,