The recently revised small-<a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mi>x</a:mi></a:math> helicity evolution [], resumming the double-logarithmic factor, <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><c:mrow><c:msub><c:mrow><c:mi>α</c:mi></c:mrow><c:mrow><c:mi mathvariant="normal">s</c:mi></c:mrow></c:msub><c:msup><c:mrow><c:mi>ln</c:mi></c:mrow><c:mrow><c:mn>2</c:mn></c:mrow></c:msup><c:mo stretchy="false">(</c:mo><c:mn>1</c:mn><c:mo>/</c:mo><c:mi>x</c:mi><c:mo stretchy="false">)</c:mo></c:mrow></c:math>, allows for the study of helicity distributions of quarks and gluons at small Bjorken <h:math xmlns:h="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><h:mi>x</h:mi></h:math>, corresponding to high center-of-mass energy. In this work, we calculate the moderate-<j:math xmlns:j="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><j:mi>x</j:mi></j:math> initial conditions in the regime, <l:math xmlns:l="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><l:msub><l:mi>α</l:mi><l:mi mathvariant="normal">s</l:mi></l:msub><l:msup><l:mi>ln</l:mi><l:mn>2</l:mn></l:msup><l:mo stretchy="false">(</l:mo><l:mn>1</l:mn><l:mo>/</l:mo><l:mi>x</l:mi><l:mo stretchy="false">)</l:mo><l:mo>∼</l:mo><l:mn>1</l:mn></l:math>, for the small-<q:math xmlns:q="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><q:mi>x</q:mi></q:math> helicity evolution using a light-front valence quark model of the proton, which provides additional physical information about the target. The perturbative emission and absorption of a gluon by the valence quarks are also included. The results, given in Eqs. (35), provide a new set of initial conditions with a significantly reduced number of free parameters than conventional models []. Consequently, the predictive power of small-<s:math xmlns:s="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><s:mi>x</s:mi></s:math> helicity evolution is expected to improve once the initial conditions from this work are incorporated. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dumitru et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: