Comparative evaluation demonstrates enhanced protein recovery and isoform resolution in cell lysates, highlighting the utility of reversed-phase chromatography for proteoform profiling.
We revisited protein reversed-phase chromatography (RP), using state-of-the-art RP columns developed for biopharmaceuticals, such as monoclonal antibodies, in order to evaluate the suitability of this methodology as a prefractionation step for bottom-up proteomics. The protein RP prefractionation (Prot-RP) method was compared with two other widely used prefractionation methods, SDS-PAGE and high-pH peptide RP (Pept-RP) by using cell lysates as samples. The overlap between fractions of Prot-RP was comparable to that of SDS-PAGE, and the protein recovery was approximately 2-fold higher. On the other hand, the overlap between fractions of Prot-RP was slightly larger than that of Pept-RP, but Prot-RP was able to identify more protein termini and more isoform-specific peptides than Pept-RP. Our results indicate that the combination of highly efficient protein prefractionation with modern mass spectrometers is particularly effective for proteoform profiling from cellular samples.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takagi et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: