Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
During the process of embedding Party building into the construction of "one-stop" student communities in universities, various actors are influenced by the administrative logic of universities, the logic of community autonomy, and the logic of individual action. This leads to deviations between the ideal design and the actual state, tensions between centralized and decentralized resources, and differences between passive involvement and value recognition. Grassroots Party organizations within student communities can effectively enhance their leadership by embedding themselves spatially, structurally, and cognitively. By innovating collaborative governance mechanisms, expanding element aggregation mechanisms, and forming value cohesion mechanisms, a two-way coupling between Party leadership and community autonomy can be realized, thereby empowering and enhancing the construction of "one-stop" student communities.
Jie Zheng (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: