Accuracy of convex probe EBUS-TBNA versus FDG-PET/CT imaging in diagnosis and mediastinal staging of lung cancer patients; an Egyptian Experience

This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.

Background Appropriate staging of lung cancer is of paramount importance, as it customizes treatment and predicts prognosis. Both Fludeoxyglucose-18 (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) combined with contrast computed tomography (CT) and endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) are two widely used diagnostic modalities in the field of staging & diagnosis of lung malignancies, the former depends on image analysis while the later enables real-time sampling of lymph nodes under sonographic guidance. Objective To compare the diagnostic and staging accuracy of convex probe EBUS-TBNA versus FDG – PET/CT as two modalities in diagnosis & mediastinal staging of lung cancer patients. Methods This prospective, observational (daignostic accuracy) research was performed on 40 cases with lung malignancies. All cases were examined via FDG-PET/CT followed by convex probe EBUS-TBNA for diagnosis & staging of concurrent mediastinal lymphadenopathy (MLN). Results The diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA reached 92.5% (37/40) compared to 70% (28/40) for FDG-PET/CT. There was poor agreement between EBUS-TBNA & FDG-PET/CT regarding (MLN) staging ( k = 0.043), in 16/40 patients (40%), EBUS MLN staging matched that of FDG-PET/CT, while in 24/40(60%) there were discrepancies between the two diagnostic modalities; 18/40(45%) were up-staged after EBUS while 6/40(15%) were down staged after EBUS. In addition, EBUS-TBNA confirmed occult mediastinal nodal involvement in 9/10 FDG-PET/CT negative scans (N0). The overall diagnostic accuracy of EBUS-TBNA was significantly greater than FDG-PET/CT in staging of lung cancer (97.37% & 70% respectively, p < 0.001). Conclusion EBUS-TBNA is a minimally invasive procedure that we currently recommend as a first choice for MLN staging. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06479798. Registered 26 June 2024—Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06479798 .