Artificial Intelligence-Aided Design (AIAD) has numerous advantages and tremendous benefits for designers. However, not all designers are keen to integrate AIAD into their workflow, and their intention to use AIAD remains a research gap. This study explores designers’ adoption of AIAD, utilizing the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Drawing on extant literature, we proposed a research model and tested it using data from 392 Chinese designers. The results indicate that in terms of AIAD, (a) designers’ attitudes toward AIAD ( b = 0.259, p < 0.001), subjective norms ( b = 0.363, p < 0.001), and perceived behavioral control ( b = 0.556, p < 0.001) have significant and positive impacts on their intention to use AIAD; (b) perceived usefulness of AIAD ( b = 0.910, p < 0.001) has a positive and significant correlation with attitudes toward AIAD while perceived ease of use ( b = −0.126, p < 0.05) exerts no significant impact on attitudes; (c) the knowledge level of designers ( b = −0.149, p < 0.01) has a negative moderating effect on the impact of attitudes toward AIAD on the intention to use them. The present research then discusses its practical significance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiao et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: