Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Abstract Purpose: The Piedmont study is a prospectively designed retrospective evaluation of a new 48-gene antifolate response signature (AF-PRS) in patients with locally advanced/metastatic NS-NSCLC treated with pemetrexed-containing platinum doublet chemotherapy (PMX-PDC). The study tested the hypothesis that AF-PRS selects for patients with NS-NSCLC that preferentially respond to PMX-PDC, with a goal of providing clinical support for AF-PRS as potential diagnostic test. Experimental Design: Residual pre-treatment FFPE tumor samples and clinical data were analyzed from 105 patients treated with 1st-line (1L) PMX-PDC. 95 patients had sufficient RNA sequencing (RNAseq) data quality and clinical annotation for inclusion in the analysis. Associations between AF-PRS status and associate genes, and outcome measures including progression-free survival (PFS) and clinical response were evaluated. Results: Overall, 53% of patients were AF-PRS(+), which was associated with extended PFS, but not OS, vs. AF-PRS(-) (16.6 vs. 6.6 mo; p = 0.025). In patients who were Stage I-III patients at time of treatment, PFS was further extended in AF-PRS(+) vs. AF-PRS(-) (36.2 vs. 9.3 mo; p = 0.03). Complete response (CR) to therapy was noted in 14 of 95 patients. AF-PRS(+) preferentially selected a majority (79%) of CRs, which were evenly split between patients Stage I-III (6 of 7) and Stage IV (5 of 7) at time of treatment. Conclusions: AF-PRS identified a significant population of patients with extended PFS and/or clinical response following PMX-PDC treatment. AF-PRS may be a useful diagnostic test for patients indicated for systemic chemotherapy, especially when determining the optimal PDC regimen for locally advanced disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eisner et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: