This systematic review identifies key technologies and methods for assessing eyelid movements, suggesting insights for future applications.
Abstract Purpose The primary objective of this study is to identify the technology, methods, and tools commonly employed in automated applications for assessing altered eyelid movements. Methods This review consulted three databases known for their excellent reputation and technical quality: PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The initial search identified 905 papers. Removing duplicates and applying exclusion criteria narrowed the selection to 31 documents for analysis. The search included publications from January 2018 to June 2024 to focus on recent works. Results This review identified the dominance of image analysis in extracting eyelid-related parameters. The image used to analyze eyelid movements appears in 20 of the 31 selected studies. After image acquisition, machine learning is the predominant technique for extracting eyelid parameters. Recently, mobile applications have facilitated the study of eyelid movements, enabling single-step analyses and broadening accessibility. Blink frequency remains the most utilized parameter for eyelid movement analysis, and cameras are the most common sensor for capturing these movements. Conclusion The analysis identified the most used technology, methods, and tools for analyzing automated applications that assess altered eyelid movements. Specifically, this review shows that image analysis, primarily through machine learning, is vital for evaluating eyelid movements, with blink frequency as the most analyzed parameter. Also, mobile applications have expanded access to these assessments, using cameras as the primary sensor and enabling simpler, single-step analyses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bonesso et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: