This framework evaluates economic effectiveness of collaborative robotics, indicating improved use-case selection for automotive firms.
Amid Kazakhstan’s accelerated digitalization and national smart-manufacturing agenda, this paper presents a practice-oriented economic framework for evaluating, at the pre-design stage, the feasibility of deploying collaborative and mobile robotics in the automotive industry. The goal is to align engineering choices with production economics before on-site trials, reducing the risk of inflated expectations and showcase-only pilots. Methodologically, the framework combines conceptual modeling with quantitative screening: it decomposes total cost of ownership into capital and operating elements; maps operational effects across body/assembly stations, quality control, and inplant logistics; and ties these effects to measurable KPIs – overall equipment effectiveness (and its Availability- Performance-Quality factors), cycle time, defect rates, planned/unplanned downtime, and safety incidents. A distinctive feature is the explicit integration of infrastructure constraints and risk factors – precision and calibration requirements, connectivity and communication quality, safety for human – robot collaboration, cybersecurity exposure, and workforce acceptance – into both the economics and a managerial go/no-go checklist. The framework yields (i) a reproducible pilot → expand → scale pathway with milestone metrics, (ii) a structured data package to enable subsequent statistical verification and learning across pilots, and (iii) adaptable accounting rules that fit local procurement and budgeting practices. By making trade-offs transparent and context-aware, the approach supports Kazakhstani automotive firms in selecting viable use cases, sizing investments, and sequencing deployments in line with national digitalization priorities
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Алшанов et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: