⌘+K

Pulse Explore Communities Researchers Journals

Home Communities Explore

September 16, 2024

Supplementary Figure 1 from Sources of disparities in surveillance mammography performance and risk-guided recommendations for supplemental breast imaging: A simulation study

Rebecca A. Hubbard Toyya A. Pujol Elie Alhajjar Kossi Delali Edoh Melissa L. Martin

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Abstract

Supplementary Figure 1. Simulation results for surveillance mammography false-negative rates overall and stratified by race and ethnicity in simulated populations of women with a personal history of breast cancer

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Hubbard et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e586b5b6db643587522ccf https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.27029788.v1

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Supplementary Figure 1 from Sources of disparities in surveillance mammography performance and risk-guided recommendations for supplemental breast imaging: A simulation study2024
2Supplementary Figure 2 from Sources of disparities in surveillance mammography performance and risk-guided recommendations for supplemental breast imaging: A simulation study2024
3Supplementary Figure 2 from Sources of disparities in surveillance mammography performance and risk-guided recommendations for supplemental breast imaging: A simulation study2024
4Supplementary Figure 3 from Sources of disparities in surveillance mammography performance and risk-guided recommendations for supplemental breast imaging: A simulation study2024
5Supplementary Figure 3 from Sources of disparities in surveillance mammography performance and risk-guided recommendations for supplemental breast imaging: A simulation study2024