⌘+K

Pulse Explore Clubs Researchers Journals

Home Clubs Explore

September 15, 2024Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica ScandinavicaOpen Access

Severe adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes according to the planned birth setting being midwife‐led birth centers or obstetric‐led units

Clara Rollet Camille Le Ray Françoise Vendittelli Béatrice Blondel Anne Alice Chantry

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Abstract

The establishment of midwife-led birth centers (MLBCs) is still being debated. The study aimed to compare severe adverse outcomes and mode of birth in low-risk women according to their birth planned in MLBCs or in obstetric-led units (OUs) in France.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Rollet et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e587f9b6db643587524518 https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14971

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Severe Adverse Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes According to the Planned Birth Setting Being Midwife-led Birth Centers or Obstetric-led Units2025
2Perceptions of quality of care in Midwife-led Birth Centres (MLBCs) in Uganda: Why do women choose MLBCs over other options?2024 · 10 citations
3Midwife-led birthing centres in Bangladesh, Pakistan and Uganda: an economic evaluation of case study sites2024 · 4 citations
4Impact of Midwifery-led units in Spain: lessons from the first 5 years2024 · 2 citations
5Maternal and Peri/Neonatal Mortality and Morbidity in Midwife‐Assisted Low‐Risk Birth Outside Hospital Compared to Obstetric Team‐Assisted Low‐Risk Hospital Birth: A Systematic Review and Meta‐AnalysisCohort Study · 2026