PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 12, 2024Applied Sciences13 citationsOpen Access

Human–AI Co-Drawing: Studying Creative Efficacy and Eye Tracking in Observation and Cooperation

View Full Paper
YPYuying PeiLWLinlin WangCXChengqi Xue

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) tools are rapidly transforming the field of traditional artistic creation, influencing painting processes and human creativity. This study explores human–AI cooperation in real-time artistic drawing by using the AIGC tool KREA.AI. Participants wear eye trackers and perform drawing tasks by adjusting the AI parameters. The research aims to investigate the impact of cross-screen and non-cross-screen conditions, as well as different viewing strategies, on cognitive load and the degree of creative stimulation during user–AI collaborative drawing. Adopting a mixed design, it examines the influence of different cooperation modes and visual search methods on creative efficacy and visual perception through eye-tracking data and creativity performance scales. The cross-screen type and task type have a significant impact on total interval duration, number of fixation points, average fixation duration, and average pupil diameter in occlusion decision-making and occlusion hand drawing. There are significant differences in the variables of average gaze duration and average pupil diameter among different task types and cross-screen types. In non-cross-screen situations, occlusion and non-occlusion have a significant impact on average gaze duration and pupil diameter. Tasks in non-cross-screen environments are more sensitive to visual processing. The involvement of AI in hand drawing in non-cross-screen collaborative drawing by designers has a significant impact on their visual perception. These results help us to gain a deeper understanding of user behaviour and cognitive load under different visual tasks and cross-screen conditions. The analysis of the creative efficiency scale data reveals significant differences in designers’ ability to supplement and improve AI ideas across different modes. This indicates that the extent of AI participation in the designer’s hand-drawn creative process significantly impacts the designer’s behaviour when negotiating design ideas with the AI.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pei et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e58a69b6db643587526d41https://doi.org/10.3390/app14188203
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Blind Image Quality Assessment by Visual Neuron Matrix2021 · 24 citations
  2. 2The Power of Generative AI: A Review of Requirements, Models, Input–Output Formats, Evaluation Metrics, and Challenges2023 · 623 citations
  3. 3Differences in thinking flexibility between novices and experts based on eye tracking2022 · 10 citations
  4. 4Social Presence and Imagery Processing as Predictors of Chatbot Continuance Intention in Human-AI-Interaction2022 · 184 citations
  5. 5Study on Error-Cognition Mechanism of Task Interface in Complex Information System2017 · 7 citations