Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: In this study, we aim to screen MESP1 variants in congenital heart disease (CHD), and explore the biological functions of these variants. Methods: Targeted sequencing was used to screen MESP1 variants in a cohort of patients with CHD and healthy controls from Shandong Province, China, and confirm the variants with Sanger sequencing. Dual-luciferase reporter assay was used to assess the effects of MESP1 variants on the expression of downstream target genes in HEK293T and H9C2 cells. Binding affinity with NKX2-5 between variants and wild-type MESP1 was detected in HEK293T cells using an electrophoretic gel mobility shift assay (EMSA). The teratogenic effects of the MESP1 variants compared to the wild-type were explored with zebrafish embryo microinjection. Results: We identified two rare mutations, namely c.359T>C (p.L120P) and c.526A>T (p.T176S), in MESP1 . The impact of these mutations was investigated using dual-luciferase reporter assay. Our findings demonstrate that compared to the wild-type, the mutation c.359T>C (p.L120P) significantly inhibits the expression of downstream target genes, whereas the mutation c.526A>T (p.T176S) does not exhibit altered activity. Further insights from EMSA revealed that the mutation c.359T>C (p.L120P) displays a reduced binding affinity with NKX2-5 . Notably, our investigation involving zebrafish embryo microinjection unveiled a significant increase in the rate of malformation associated with the mutation c.359T>C (p.L120P). Conclusions: Two rare mutations in MESP1 were identified in the CHD cohort. Our in vitro and in vivo studies showed that MESP1 c.359T>C (p.L120P) is a loss-of-function mutation that may increase the risk of CHD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peng et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: