Objective Access to care can be impacted adversely by appointment adherence. We aimed to identify predictors of no-shows and cancellations for neuropsychological services offered by a healthcare system serving diverse communities. Method Demographics and appointment status were documented from a sample of 537 consecutive patients scheduled for neuropsychological evaluation at an outpatient psychiatry clinic. Patients included 220 males and 317 females with an average formal education of 11.01 years (SD = 3.87) and age of 55.64 years (SD = 16.2). Chi-square analyses were used to evaluate the association between appointment status and gender, race/ethnicity, payor, availability of a collateral, and MyChart access. Multivariate analysis of variance was used to assess the relationship between age, education, proxy income, and prior no-show rate with appointment status. Results The overall rate of no-shows or late cancellations was 20%, and some patients no-showed multiple times. No-shows and late cancellations were associated with historical no-show rates and older age (F = 14.60, p < 0.0001), while race/ethnicity and MyChart activation had slight impacts (χ2 = 5.572, p = 0.062 and χ2 = 3.69, p = 0.055, respectively). Being a monolingual Spanish speaker was associated negatively with MyChart activation, but positively with collateral availability (p < 0.05). Conclusions No-show rates, which impact access to care, are high and associated with prior history of no-shows. Other factors, such as MyChart activation and culturally-associated barriers may also impact access. Implementing interventions addressing prior no-show rates and enhancing MyChart access could significantly increase show rates; such improvements could increase patient access to care, reduce the system’s financial burden, and decrease wait times for other patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Woolsey et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: