Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of washing the femoral canal on the seating of the short femoral stem in cementless short-stem hip arthroplasty. Methods: This single-center randomized controlled trial included 50 patients divided into unwashed and washed groups. All patients underwent cementless short-stem hip arthroplasty with the Metha® short-stem. The primary outcome measured was the discrepancy between the final rasp and implanted stem, with a mismatch of >2 mm considered clinically significant. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative factors associated with a significant mismatch. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors related to a clinically significant mismatch between the final rasp and implant. The subsidence and revision were recorded at 4 years follow-up. Results: The study found that 44% of the cases in the unwashed group had a clinically significant mismatch, compared with 8% in the washed group (P=0.001). The mean discrepancy was 2.4 mm in the unwashed group and 1.2 mm in the washed group (P<0.001). Univariate regression analysis indicated that not washing the canal was associated with a higher rate of significant mismatches (odds ratio [OR]=9.05, P=0.009). No cases of stem subsidence or revision were observed at 4 years follow-up in either group. Conclusions: Washing the femoral canal with saline significantly reduced the discrepancy between the final rasp and the implant in cementless short-stem hip arthroplasty, potentially improving surgical outcomes and reducing leg length discrepancies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tippimanchai et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: