OBJECTIVE: To describe rehabilitation and decision-making from ACL reconstruction to return to sport (RTS), characteristics and RTS proportions for pivoting sports athletes undergoing usual care. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: We invited people with ACL reconstruction who were aged 16-40 years, and injured during soccer, handball, or basketball, and registered in the Norwegian Knee Ligament Register, to complete a study-specific questionnaire at 1-3 years post-surgery. We reported descriptive statistics and RTS proportions for return to participation, sport and performance. RESULTS: Of 1,875 individuals, 631 (34%) responded. The physical therapist-led rehabilitation ceased before 9 months in 52% (n=268), and a physical therapist was most frequently involved in RTS decisions (n=462, 77%). Fifty-five percent (n=353) of the participants underwent physical testing prior to RTS. At a mean of 2.3 years (SD=0.8) after ACL reconstruction, 62% (n=391) returned to participation, 50% (n=312) returned to sport, and 17% (n=93) returned to pre-injury performance. The main reasons for non-return were fear of re-injury (35%, n=27) and knee problems (35%, n=27). Median time to RTS was 12 months (interquartile range 10 to 15 months), and 16% (n=102) had sustained a new ACL injury at follow-up. CONCLUSION: This nationwide study found that half of pivoting sport athletes ceased rehabilitation within 9 months, half performed physical testing to inform RTS, with physical therapists most frequently involved in the RTS-decision. Half of the athletes returned to sport, and one in six returned to performance. RTS proportions were highest in athletes younger than 20 years.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kooy et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: