The feedback data obtained in the process of questioning members of accreditation subcommittees is one of the significant components of the consistent improvement of the accreditation process. The article provides a comparison of data from the pilot and multicenter stages of the Accred-ROSOMED prospective study, dedicated to the analytics of a survey of members of accreditation subcommittees regarding the most important issues of the accreditation process in the 2022 and 2023. These studies emphasize the importance of the mentioned issues, forming the basis for subsequent research continuation in order to provide the most complete and detailed representation of the accreditation process in the regions of Russian Federation and compare it with international experience.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ripp et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: