Due to the ongoing debate of whether WASP19b is experiencing orbital decay or apsidal precession, I reexamine the orbital evolution of the hot Jupiter WASP-19b using new TESS data from sectors 09, 36, 62, and 63. My comprehensive analysis of transit and occultation timing variations compares models of constant period, orbital decay, and apsidal precession. Results show no significant preference between orbital decay and apsidal precession models. I find a period change rate of −1.40 ± 0.54 ms yr −1 , slower than some previous studies but consistent with others. My apsidal precession analysis yields an eccentricity of 0.00178 and a precession rate of 0.036 deg day −1 , differing from recent literature. These findings underscore the complexity of WASP-19b’s orbital dynamics and the need for continued long-term monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zoutong Shen (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: