Abstract Background: To investigate the positioning accuracy and clinical efficacy of 3D-printed, personalized guide plate assisted lateral ankle ligament reconstruction. Methods: We retrospectively studied 48 patients with chronic lateral ankle instability and divided them into two groups: the template group (24 patients) and the conventional group (24 patients). The operation time, intraoperative X-ray exposure time, American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society and Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) were compared between the two groups. Results: All patients were followed up for 12-20 months (14.5 ± 5.5). The operation time in the template group was 32-55 min (38.6 ± 9.7), the operation time in the conventional group was 48-73 min (58.3 ± 12.6), and there was a significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05). The number of X-ray exposures in the template group was 1-3 (1.2 ± 0.6), the number of X-ray exposures in the conventional group was 3-6 (3.8 ± 2.2), and there was a significant difference between the two groups (p<0.05). There was no significant difference in the AOFAS score or FAOS score between the two groups before the operation orat the last follow-up after the operation. There was no significant difference in the talar anteversion distance or talar varus angle between the two groups at the last follow-up after the operation. Conclusion: Comparedwith conventional surgery, 3D-printedtemplate surgery has a shorter operation time, higher positioning accuracy, and shorterradiation exposure time. 3D printing template surgery is a successful treatment option with the same satisfactory effect on patients with chronic lateral ankle instability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luo et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: