Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: to compare 229 patients admitted to ICUs with COVID-19 and for other reasons, comparing the Functional Independence Measure-FIM after 3 months of discharge. Methodology: it is a cross-sectional study, with convenience sampling and a quantitative approach. 197 patients from the Adult-ICU and 32 from the ICU-COVID participated, at different times. Results: there were more older patients in the COVID-19 group than in the other (medians = 54.5 and 40 years; p = 0.000146). No difference was observed between genders, and patients with COVID-19 exhibited more comorbidities. There was no difference between ICU and mechanical ventilation days, but the “p” values were close to significant. Patients with COVID-19 had a median time of 9 days in the ICU and 7 days on MV, and those hospitalized for other causes, 6 days in the ICU and 1.9 days on MV. Genders were equally distributed, but hypertensive and diabetic patients were more numerous in the group with COVID-19 (p < 0.0001). There was no evidence of difference in functional capacity between the groups, with locomotion, sphincter control and communication being the most affected. Comparison of the FIM percentages after 3 months of discharge showed no differences, however the average values indicated complete rehabilitation for both groups. Conclusion: some results were corroborated by the literature, but should be interpreted with caution due to the low number of patients admitted to ICUs due to COVID-19 and the absence of FIM at the beginning of hospitalization and after discharge.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Costa et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: