In this study, simultaneous removal tests (fixed initial As concentration of 1 mg/L) for As(III) and F were performed using three types of Mg-based adsorbents. Their As(III) removal performance was in the order of MgCO 3 << Mg(OH) 2 < MgO. MgO met the environmental standards for As (0.01 mg/L) at initial F concentrations ( C F0 ) of 15 and 30 mg/L. MgO and Mg(OH) 2 met the As effluent standard (0.1 mg/L) even at C F0 = 60 mg/L. In contrast, MgCO 3 did not meet the effluent standards under the test conditions. The F removal performance of the Mg-based adsorbents followed the order of MgCO 3 < Mg(OH) 2 < MgO. MgO and Mg(OH) 2 met the environmental standard of F (0.8 mg/L), whereas MgCO 3 met the effluent standards for F in non-marine areas (8 mg/L) at C F0 = 15 and 30 mg/L, and in marine areas (15 mg/L) even at C F0 = 60 mg/L. The As(III) adsorption data fit the Langmuir model for MgO and the Freundlich model for MgO and Mg(OH) 2 , but not MgCO 3 for either model. Notably, the As(III) adsorption behavior of MgO was strongly influenced by C F0 . Meanwhile, the F adsorption data fit both the Langmuir and Freundlich models for all Mg-based adsorbents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sugita et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: