Steady-state numerical simulations were conducted to capture the aerodynamic characteristics and flow patterns resulting from a tubercled and non-tubercled wing subjected to various combined pitch and yaw conditions at Re=1.8 × 10⁵ R e = 1.8 × 10 5 . Pitch angle ranged from 0∘ 0 ∘ to 25∘ 25 ∘ , while two different yaw angles of 10∘ 10 ∘ and 30∘ 30 ∘ were used. Results show that 10∘ 10 ∘ yaw angle does not impact upon the lift and drag characteristics significantly, while a 30∘ 30 ∘ yaw angle leads to substantial lift and drag losses. Additionally, the tubercled wing continues to confer favourable stall-mitigating characteristics even for the larger yaw angle. Finally, despite skewing the flow structures significantly, the 30∘ 30 ∘ yaw angle also reduces the formations of bi-periodic flow structures, flow separations and recirculating regions along the leading-edge tubercles, suggesting potentially better flow stability and controllability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
New et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: