Effects of the yaw angle on the drag reduction rate of riblets were investigated experimentally for trapezoidal riblets with ridge angle of 30^∘ 30 ∘ and height-to-spacing ratio of 0.5 in a turbulent wind channel at Reynolds numbers (based on the friction velocity and channel half depth) Re_τ = 520 - 2100 Re τ = 520 - 2100 . Drag reduction rates were estimated carefully by comparing the streamwise pressure gradients between turbulent channel flows with and without riblets. The maximum drag reduction rate which was about 7% for the streamwise riblets was maintained without any attenuation for the yaw angle φ ϕ below 10^∘ 10 ∘ . When φ ϕ exceeded 10^∘ 10 ∘ , the drag reduction rate was attenuated steeply and the performance of riblets was almost lost at φ = 15^∘ ϕ = 15 ∘ . The yaw angle at which the drag turned to increase was by 10º smaller than the value reported for the saw-tooth riblets. The yaw angle effect on the riblet performance was further examined by detailed comparisons of mean velocity profiles and turbulent structures near the ribbed surfaces for φ = 10^∘ ϕ = 10 ∘ and 15^∘ 15 ∘ . Although no appreciable difference in the turbulent intensity and pre-multiplied spectrum of near-wall turbulence was found between these cases ( φ = 10^∘ ϕ = 10 ∘ and 15^∘ 15 ∘ ), the mean velocity profile for the case of φ = 15^∘ ϕ = 15 ∘ indicated an evidence of flow separation at the ridges of riblets, leading to the attenuation of drag-reduction rate due to increase in the pressure drag.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Inasawa et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: