Key result
Directly contacting relatives significantly increased the likelihood of cascade testing for familial hypercholesterolaemia (OR 2.11; 95% CI 1.66-2.69).
Observational (n=6,833)
Yes
Less than a third of relatives of FH index cases are tested in UK cascade services, highlighting the need for direct contact methods and targeted strategies to engage men and out-of-area relatives.
Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a monogenic disorder that causes high levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. Cascade testing, where relatives of known individuals with FH ('index') are genetically tested, is effective and cost-effective, but implementation in the UK varies. This study aims to provide evidence on current UK FH cascade yields and to identify common obstacles cascade services face and individual- and service-level predictors of success. Electronic health records from 875 index families and 5,958 linked relatives in the UK's Welsh and Wessex FH services (2019) were used to explore causes for non-testing and to estimate testing rates, detection yields, and how relative characteristics and contact methods relate to the probability of relatives being tested (using logistic regression). In Wales (Wessex), families included 7.35 (7.01) members on average, with 2.41 (1.66) relatives tested and 1.35 (0.96) diagnosed with FH per index. Cascade testing is limited by individualized circumstances (too young, not at-risk, etc.) and FH services' reach, with approximately one in four relatives out-of-area. In Wales, first-degree relatives (odds ratio (OR): 1.55 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.28, 1.88]) and directly contacted relatives (OR: 2.11 [CI: 1.66, 2.69]) were more likely to be tested. In Wales and Wessex, women were more likely to be tested than men (ORs: 1.53 [CI: 1.28, 1.85] and 1.74 [CI: 1.32, 2.27]). In Wales and Wessex less than a third of relatives of an index are tested for FH. Improvements are likely possible by integrating geographically dispersed families into cascade testing, services directly contacting relatives where possible, and finding new ways to encourage participation, particularly amongst men.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cox et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Familial hypercholesterolaemia (n=6,833). Direct contact by FH services vs. Indirect contact was evaluated on Probability of relatives being tested for FH (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.66-2.69). Directly contacting relatives significantly increased the likelihood of cascade testing for familial hypercholesterolaemia (OR 2.11; 95% CI 1.66-2.69).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: