Determination of greenhouse evapotranspiration (ET c ) and the response mechanism of environmental factors are important for accurate irrigation management and greenhouse environmental control. Models for predicting ET c under greenhouse conditions are extremely scarce in comparison to those under open field conditions. Meteorological data inside and outside a Venlo‐type greenhouse were measured from April to July 2015 to estimate the reference evapotranspiration (ET 0 ) based on four approaches (the Penman–Monteith model, a revised Penman–Monteith model, a modified Priestley–Taylor approach and the Irmark–Allen fitting approach). The daily ET 0 values inside the greenhouse calculated from these four methods presented similar variation trends but were somewhat different. The ET c for eggplant in the greenhouse was measured by lysimeters to estimate the crop coefficient with the FAO‐56 method ( K c = ET c /ET 0 ), and the response mechanism of environmental factors on the ET c was analysed. The results showed that the crop coefficients of the eggplant were different, with values of 0.94–1.97, 0.83–1.87, 0.64–1.34 and 0.58–1.21 based on the ET 0 from the Penman–Monteith model, revised Penman–Monteith model, modified Priestley–Taylor approach and Irmark–Allen fitting approach, respectively; the net radiation showed the highest correlation with the ET c ; the secondary parameters were the air temperature and solar radiation, with R 2 values equal to 0.77 and 0.75, respectively; and the relative humidity and soil temperature showed different extents of influence on the ET c . The results of this study provide more options for greenhouse cultivars to accurately determine the ET c of eggplants using the FAO‐56 method based on the availability of different meteorological data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: