The purpose of this research is to describe the advisability of the E-LAPD developed, including its validity, practicality, and effectiveness. The type of research used is research and development (R&D) with the 4-D model proposed by S. Thiagarajan, Dorothy S. Semmel, and Melvyn I. Semmel (1974). The data collection method used was observation, questionnaire, and test. The results showed that validity has a mode worth 3 because it has the largest percentage in three criteria (content, construct, and graphics). Practicality received very practical criteria, with a percentage of 97% in the content aspect and 98% in the graphic aspect. Effectiveness received effective criteria, with the outcome of the N-gain score obtained indicating a value of 0.8. Nevertheless, the N-gain score for each creative thinking component shows originality 0.7, fluency 0.82, flexibility 0.86, and elaboration 0.8. This research's finding is that E-LAPD with problem-based learning oriented to train creative thinking skills on reaction rate material is feasible to develop as teaching material.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Agustine et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: