Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper evaluates the performance of two different types of long combination vehicles (A-double and DuoCAT) using naturalistic driving data across four scenarios: lane changes, manoeuvring through roundabouts, turning in intersections, and negotiating tight curves. Four different performance-based standards measures are used to assess the stability and tracking performance of the vehicles: rearward amplification, high-speed transient offtracking, low-speed swept path, and high-speed steady-state offtracking. Also, the steering reversal rate metric is employed to estimate the cognitive workload of the drivers in low-speed scenarios. In the majority of the identified cases of the four scenarios, both combination types have a good performance. The A-double shows slightly better stability in high-speed lane changes, while the DuoCAT has slightly better manoeuvrability at low-speed scenarios like roundabouts and intersections.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Behera et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: