In the last year of the Popular Unity government (1973) the country expressed the political, economic and social conflict through a level of polarization that transversally tense the re-lationships between the different classes of Chilean society. A polarization caused by permanent foreign and internal eco-nomic pressures on the government, the explicitly formulated strategy of the political opposition and a sector of civil socie-ty to put an end to “the Chilean path to socialism” and, final-ly, the political crisis. internal conflict that the Popular Unity faced. In this confrontational context, a little-regarded aspect relates to the fact that both the government and the opposition symbolically delegated historical processes for legitimatory purposes. Both the government and the opposition used a historical interpretation of the Civil War of 1891 as an in-strument of political legitimation: the Popular Unity government to vindicate its political project of achieving socialism through democratic means, and the opposition to explain their “political-moral incompetence” to avoid a civil war.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gorka Villar Vásquez (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: