A central question which originates in the celebrated work in the 1980's of DiPerna and Majda asks what is the optimal decay $f > 0$ such that uniform rates |ω|(Q) ≤ f(|Q|) of the vorticity maximal functions guarantee strong convergence without concentrations of approximate solutions to energy-conserving weak solutions of the $2$D Euler equations with vortex sheet initial data. A famous result of Majda (1993) shows f(r) = [log (1/r)]-1/2, $r<1/2$, as the optimal decay for distinguished sign vortex sheets. In the general setting of mixed sign vortex sheets, DiPerna and Majda (1987) established f(r) = [log (1/r)]-α with α > 1 as a sufficient condition for the lack of concentrations, while the expected gap α ∈ (1/2, 1] remains as an open question. In this paper we resolve the DiPerna-Majda $2$D gap problem: In striking contrast to the well-known case of distinguished sign vortex sheets, we identify f(r) = [log (1/r)]⁻¹ as the optimal regularity for mixed sign vortex sheets that rules out concentrations. For the proof, we propose a novel method to construct explicitly solutions with mixed sign to the $2$D Euler equations in such a way that wild behaviour creates within the relevant geometry of sparse cubes (i.e., these cubes are not necessarily pairwise disjoint, but their possible overlappings can be controlled in a sharp fashion). Such a strategy is inspired by the recent work of the first author and Milman {DM} where strong connections between energy conservation and sparseness are established.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Domínguez et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: