Background:The study analyzes trends in the average number of authors per "original article" in three high-impact scientific journals (The Journal of the American Medical Association [JAMA], The New England Journal of Medicine [NEJM], and The Lancet [TL]) over two decades.Methods: The mean number of authors per publication was calculated and compared across the two decades.Comparisons were made both by publication year and by journal.Results: A total of 1645 articles were included: 529 (39.15%) from JAMA, 627 (38.11%) from NEJM, and 510 (31.0%) from TL.The mean number of authors in 2003 was 10.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 5-12, range 1-382), in 2013 it was 20.4 (IQR 9-21, range 1-596), and in 2023 it was 40.5 (IQR 15-33, range 2-785).Significant differences were found in the number of authors between years, with a rising trend in the mean (p < 0.001).A higher increase rate in authors was observed compared to the collected literature, possibly due to the exclusive selection of original articles.As a secondary result, significant differences were found in the number of authors between TL and NEJM (p = 0.003), as well as between TL and JAMA (p < 0.001).No significant difference was found between JAMA and NEJM (p = 0.180).Conclusions: The mean number of authors per original article in the journals JAMA, NEJM, and TL has increased from 2003 to 2023, with a mean of 9.84 between 2003 and 2013 and 20.1 between 2013 and 2023.Our findings align with the trend of increasing authorship observed in the collected literature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gómez‐Almaguer et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: