Key result
Early, sustained non-HDL-C lowering after MI is linked to improved clinical prognosis.
Why the study?
Non-HDL-C is a secondary treatment target after myocardial infarction, but the relationship between non-HDL-C levels post-MI and risk of adverse outcomes needed further study.
Does intensive early and sustained lowering of non-HDL-C reduce MACE in patients after myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=56,262)
Yes
Does intensive early and sustained lowering of non-HDL-C reduce MACE in patients after myocardial infarction?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Achieving early and sustained non-HDL-C targets (<2.2 mmol/L) after MI is associated with the lowest risk of adverse outcomes, challenging the current stepwise approach for cholesterol lowering.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Non-HDL-C provides an estimate of lipid-associated risk and is a secondary treatment target after myocardial infarction (MI). The aim was to study the relationship between non-HDL-C levels after MI and risk of adverse outcomes. METHODS: From the SWEDEHEART registry, 56 262 patients with MI were included. Outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE: death, MI, and ischaemic stroke), death, and non-fatal MI. Non-HDL-C was assessed at admission, 2 months, and 1 year. Target achievement (<2.2 mmol/L) of non-HDL-C, timing thereof, and outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: During median follow-up of 5.4 years, 9549 had MACE, 5427 died, and 3946 had MI. Long-term hazard ratio (HR) for MACE in the lowest vs. the highest quartile of achieved non-HDL-C at 1 year was 0.76 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-0.81]. Short-term results were consistent also when assessing non-HDL-C levels at 2 months, including early events up to 1 year (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.68-0.92). Similar results were observed for all outcomes. Patients achieving both early and sustained targets had lowest risk of outcomes (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.74-0.86) vs. patients achieving target early or late (HR for both 0.86, 95% CI 0.79-0.93). CONCLUSIONS: The lowest achieved levels both at 2 months and at 1 year of non-HDL-C were associated with better outcome. The lowest risk was observed when target was achieved within 2 months of MI and sustained thereafter. These findings challenge the current stepwise approach for cholesterol lowering after MI, which inevitably results in delaying goal attainment and possible harm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schubert et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in myocardial infarction (n=56,262). Lowest quartile of achieved non-HDL-C at 1 year vs. Highest quartile of achieved non-HDL-C at 1 year was evaluated on major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE: death, MI, and ischaemic stroke) (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.71-0.81). Achieving the lowest quartile of non-HDL-C at 1 year after myocardial infarction was associated with a lower risk of major cardiovascular events compared to the highest quartile.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: