Airfoil self-noise is investigated on a cantilever wing with a supercritical profile with a compressible wall-resolved large-eddy simulation. The Reynolds number based on the chord is 620,000, and the angle of attack is 5°. The aerodynamic results reveal the development of a complex vortex system at the side edge, including primary, secondary, and tertiary vortices that govern aerodynamic noise production. The wall-pressure coefficient and root-mean-square pressure coefficient contours highlight the side-edge shear layer and flow impingement of the primary vortex at the pressure-side edge as important noise-generation mechanisms. Dynamic mode decomposition shows that the dominant pressure modes on the airfoil exist along primary and secondary vortex impingement lines. Far-field acoustic predictions based on both solid and porous Ffowcs-Willliams and Hawkings’ analogies demonstrate good agreement with experimental results between 1.5 and 9 kHz. Low-frequency tonal humps observed in the spectra result from duct acoustic modes excited by airfoil self-noise, a consequence of the installation effect. For this configuration, airfoil side-edge noise did not dominate over airfoil surface noise levels, suggesting that at low to moderate angles of attack, airfoil side-edge noise is not a significant contributor to the overall acoustic emissions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deng et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: