This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Objective To explore the survival effect of thoracic gross tumor volume (GTV) in three‐dimensional (3D) radiotherapy for stage IV non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods The data cases were obtained from a single‐center retrospective analysis. From May. From 2008 to August 2018, 377 treatment criteria were enrolled. GTV was defined as the volume of the primary lesion and the hilus as well as the mediastinal metastatic lymph node. Chemotherapy was a platinum‐based combined regimen of two drugs. The number of median chemotherapy cycles was 4 (2–6), and the cut‐off value of the planning target volume (PTV) dose of the primary tumor was 63 Gy (30–76.5 Gy). The cut‐off value of GTV volume was 150 cm 3 (5.83–3535.20 cm 3 ). Results The survival rate of patients with GTV <150 cm 3 is better than patients with GTV ≥150 cm 3 . Multivariate Cox regression analyses suggested that peripheral lung cancer, radiation dose ≥63 Gy, GTV <150 cm 3 , 4–6 cycles of chemotherapy, and CR + PR are good prognostic factors for patients with stage IV non‐small cell lung cancer. The survival rate of patients with GTV <150 cm 3 was longer than patients with ≥150 cm 3 when they underwent 2 to 3 cycles of chemotherapy concurrent 3D radiotherapy ( p < 0.05). When performing 4 to 6 cycles of chemotherapy concurrent 3D radiotherapy, there was no significant difference between <150 cm 3 and ≥150 cm 3 . Conclusions The volume of stage IV NSCLC primary tumor can affect the survival of patients. Appropriate treatment methods can be opted by considering the volume of tumors to extend patients' lifetime to the utmost.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: