Key result
Regular ACEI or ARB use was not associated with overall cancer incidence compared with ARB use (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.95-1.03) or non-RAS antihypertensive use over 11.5 years.
Why the study?
Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors may influence cancer incidence, but previous findings regarding their associations with overall and site-specific cancer incidence have been inconsistent.
Does regular use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (ACEIs or ARBs) affect overall and site-specific cancer incidence compared with other antihypertensive medications in adults receiving antihypertensive treatment?
Cohort (n=94,696)
Yes
Does regular use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (ACEIs or ARBs) affect overall and site-specific cancer incidence compared with other antihypertensive medications in adults receiving antihypertensive treatment?
Provides large-scale prospective reassurance that long-term ACEI or ARB therapy does not increase overall cancer risk in antihypertensive users, despite minor site-specific signals for prostate and bladder cancer that carry small absolute rate differences.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No overall cancer risk elevation with ACEI/ARB use supports ongoing antihypertensive therapy; leaves open site-specific signals for prospective confirmation.
BACKGROUND: Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors may influence cancer incidence, but previous findings have been inconsistent. We aimed to evaluate the associations of RAS inhibitor use with overall and site-specific cancer incidence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants receiving antihypertensive treatment without prior invasive cancer (except non-melanoma skin cancer) were identified from the UK Biobank. Individuals with missing covariate data were excluded. Participants were classified as ACEI users, ARB users, or RAS inhibitor non-users, defined as participants receiving antihypertensive medications other than ACEIs or ARBs. Outcomes included overall cancer incidence and site-specific cancers. Inverse probability of treatment-weighted Cox proportional hazards models were applied to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Among 94,696 participants followed for a mean of 11.5 years, 42,930 were ACEI users, 17,681 were ARB users, and 34,085 were RAS inhibitor non-users. No significant associations were observed between ACEI or ARB use and overall cancer incidence. In site-specific analyses, ARB use showed a modest association with higher prostate cancer incidence compared with ACEI use (HR = 0.90; 95% CI, 0.82-0.99) and RAS inhibitor non-use (HR = 1.14; 95% CI, 1.02-1.27). ACEI use was associated with lower bladder cancer incidence compared with RAS inhibitor non-use (HR = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.54-0.93). CONCLUSION: RAS inhibitor use was not associated with overall cancer incidence in this large cohort of antihypertensive medication users. Although modest associations were observed between ARB use and prostate cancer incidence and between ACEI use and bladder cancer incidence, these findings should be interpreted cautiously and require confirmation in future studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shi et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Antihypertensive medication users (primarily hypertension) (n=94,696). Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors (ACEI or ARB regular use) vs. RAS inhibitor non-users (receiving other antihypertensive medications) or active comparison between ACEI and ARB users was evaluated on First diagnosis of overall incident cancer of any type (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.95-1.03). Regular ACEI or ARB use was not associated with overall cancer incidence compared with ARB use (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.95-1.03) or non-RAS antihypertensive use over 11.5 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: