Key result
Use of ARBs was not significantly associated with an increased risk of incident cancer compared with ACE inhibitors (RR 0.99; 95% CI 0.95-1.03).
Why the study?
Does the use of angiotensin receptor blockers increase the risk of incident cancer compared to ACE inhibitors in adults?
Population
317,158 adults who were new users of angiotensin receptor blockers or angiotensin-converting enzyme…
Comparison
Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) vs Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
312,753 person-years for ARB users and 435,207…
Authors
Loading...
No increased cancer risk observed with ARBs; leaves open a possible modest association.
Cohort (n=317,158)
Yes
Does the use of angiotensin receptor blockers increase the risk of incident cancer compared to ACE inhibitors in adults?
Relative Risk: 0.99 (95% CI 0.95–1.03)
Absolute Event Rate: 3.68% vs 2.96%
In a large nationwide Danish cohort, the use of ARBs was not associated with an increased risk of incident cancer overall or lung cancer compared to ACE inhibitors, reassuring their safety profile.
Pasternak et al. (2011) conducted a cohort in New users of ARBs and ACE inhibitors (n=317,158). Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARBs) vs. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors was evaluated on Incident cancer (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.95-1.03). Use of ARBs was not significantly associated with an increased risk of incident cancer compared with ACE inhibitors (RR 0.99; 95% CI 0.95-1.03).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: