Key result
Angiotensin receptor blocker use was associated with a reduced risk of incident lung cancer compared with nonuse (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.67-0.83; P<0.0001).
Why the study?
Does first-time ARB use increase the risk of incident lung cancer in US Veterans?
Cohort (n=1,229,902)
Yes
Does first-time ARB use increase the risk of incident lung cancer in US Veterans?
Hazard Ratio: 0.74 (95% CI 0.67–0.83)
Absolute Event Rate: 0.44% vs 0.57%
p-value: p=< 0.0001
In a large nationwide cohort of US Veterans, ARB use was not associated with an increased risk of lung cancer and may have a protective effect.
Supports no ARB-malignancy link in veterans; leaves open need for prospective confirmation.
INTRODUCTION: Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are commonly used antihypertensive medication with several other additional proven benefits. Recent controversy on association of lung cancer and other solid malignancy with the use of ARBs is concerning, although the follow-up studies have shown no such association. METHODS: We used data from the Department of Veterans Affairs electronic medical record system and registries to conduct a retrospective cohort study that compared first-time ARB users with nonusers in 1:15 ratio, after balancing for many baseline differences using inverse probability of treatment weights. We conducted time-to-event survival analyses on the weighted cohort. RESULTS: Of the 1 229 902 patients in the analytic cohort, 346 (0.44%) of the 78 075 treated individuals had a newly incident lung cancer and 6577 (0.57%) of 1 151 826 nontreated individuals were diagnosed with lung cancer. On double robust regression, the weighted hazard ratio was 0.74 (0.67-0.83, P < 0.0001), suggesting a lung cancer reduction effect with ARB use. There was no difference in rates by ARB subtype. CONCLUSION: In this large nationwide cohort of United States Veterans, we found no evidence to support any concern of increased risk of lung cancer among new users of ARBs compared with nonusers. Our findings were consistent with a protective effect of ARBs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rao et al. (2013) conducted a cohort in Angiotensin receptor blocker use (n=1,229,902). Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) vs. Nonusers was evaluated on newly incident lung cancer (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.67-0.83, p=< 0.0001). Angiotensin receptor blocker use was associated with a reduced risk of incident lung cancer compared with nonuse (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.67-0.83; P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: