The objective of this study was to evaluate grazing activity traits and their influence on conception method during the breeding season. In a 1-yr study, crossbred Angus cows (n = 29) were blocked by age and then randomly assigned to be fitted with a Knight global positioning system (GPS) tracking collar. All cows, except first-calf heifers (n = 12), were synchronized for fixed-timed artificial insemination (TAI) utilizing a 7d CO-Synch + CIDR protocol. Bulls and first-calf heifers were turned out on native rangeland with the cowherd 7 d after TAI for a 65-d breeding season. Cattle were managed in an intensive rotational grazing system (15 pasture movements in the first 21 d of the breeding season) with several daily pasture movements. Cows were retrospectively classified into the following groups for comparison: conception to TAI (AI; n = 12), bull-bred (BB; n =17). Total daily distance traveled (km/d), average daily elevation gain (m/d), and percentage of time spent grazing challenging topography (i.e., > 15% slope) were measured during the first 21 d of the breeding season. Data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure in SAS 9.4. The model included the main effects of conception method, pasture, and their interactions. Total daily distance travelled, and elevation gain exhibited a conception method × pasture interaction (P < 0.05). Amongst the 15 pastures, AI cows in pasture F (d 7 of breeding season, 7.69 ha, minimum elevation 36.27 m, maximum elevation 46.94 m) travelled further than BB cows (P < 0.001). Overall, cows that conceived to AI tended to travel further each day compared with BB cows (P = 0.06). Bull-bred cows exhibited a greater daily elevation gain in pasture F when compared with AI cows (P ≤ 0.001). The percentage of time spent on a challenging slope did not differ among cows (P = 0.20). These data indicate that grazing behavior patterns change based on pasture characteristics and timing of conception. Selection for grazing behavior attributes may be an important tool for selection of cows that are more reproductively punctual.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dubowsky et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: