PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 2024Voprosy filosofii0 citations

Digital Modeling of Intersubjectivity in Social Construction and Phenomenological Analyses of the World of Everyday Life

View Full Paper
VDVladimir DunaevWeatherford CollegeVKValentina KurganskayaWeatherford CollegeASAyazhan SagikyzyInstitute for Philosophy, Political Science and Religion Studies

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The widespread introduction of digital information and communication tech­nologies is changing the very nature of interpersonal and mass social interaction, creating new practices, meanings and forms of intersubjectivity. The article ana­lyzes a number of approaches to the creation of general artificial intelligence (AGI) systems based on the convergence of methods of phenomenological ana­lysis of intentional structures of intersubjectivity with technologies for creating and training artificial neural network systems of generative intelligence – Chat­GPT. It is shown that one of the most promising areas of constructing the cogni­tive architecture of AGI is the theory of frames as modeling schemes or matrices of stereotypical organization and interpretation of everyday experience. This conclusion is based on the fact that frames, as well as the procedures for swit­ching and configuring them, act as a kind of “spiritual automata” that control typical behavior of people in typical situations. The dual role of digital platforms in the social construction of reality is shown. On the one hand, digital platforms allow users to realize their aspirations and express the uniqueness of their indi­viduality, facilitate access to information, etc. On the other hand, our digital alter Ego, generated by intelligent systems, acquires the ability to recursively target, direct and control our thinking, motivations, emotional reactions, etc. The direct digital access to our spiritual life is not an inevitable consequence of the intro­duction of digital technologies into the world of everyday life, but a political project that can and should be sought for effective alternatives

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dunaev et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e59fb2b6db64358753a7edhttps://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2024-9-136-146
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Paradigm of Social Consciousness and Collective Behavior Formed Through Artificial Intelligence in The Digital Information Space2025
  2. 2Philosophical-Methodological and Social Aspects of Society's Informatization: Towards Building a Model of Culturally Conditioned Human-AI Interaction2026
  3. 3Artificial Intelligence as a Cultural Phenomenon of the Metamodern Era: A Socio-Philosophical Analysis of Algorithmic Reality2026
  4. 4The Counterfeit Spirit: AI as a Pseudo-Other and the Obstruction of the Gnostic Event in Digital Culture2026 · 7 citations
  5. 5ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, DIGITAL SOCIAL NORMS, AND CREATIVE SUBJECTS IN EDUCATION2026