PulseTrendingJournal ClubResearchersJournalsExplore
Instagram
HomeTrendingJournal ClubExplore
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 2024Deleted Journal

The effect of different surgical methods and timing of surgery on the clinical efficacy in patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage in basal ganglia

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

BHBoxiang HanZGZheng GuoLJLI Ji-wen

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Han et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5a0a6b6db64358753b48chttps://doi.org/10.54029/2024mmm
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Minimally invasive surgeries for spontaneous hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (MISICH): a multicenter randomized controlled trial2024 · 67 citations
  2. 2Comparison of therapeutic effects of endoscopic assisted different surgical approaches in hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage: A retrospective cohort study2024
  3. 3Minimally Invasive Surgery Versus Conventional Craniotomy for Spontaneous Hypertensive Supratentorial Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials2026
  4. 4Comparison treatments for basal ganglia hemorrhage: minimally invasive puncture and drainage versus craniotomy versus conservative treatment2025
  5. 5Comparison treatments for basal ganglia hemorrhage: minimally invasive puncture and drainage versus craniotomy versus conservative treatment2025