PulseTrendingJournal ClubResearchersJournalsExplore
Instagram
HomeTrendingJournal ClubExplore
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 30, 2025Journal of Comparative Effectiveness ResearchOpen Access

Comparison treatments for basal ganglia hemorrhage: minimally invasive puncture and drainage versus craniotomy versus conservative treatment

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

TTTao TangJLJing LiuBGBo Gao

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Retrospective analysis shows minimally invasive drainage improves outcomes over craniotomy in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage patients.

Key Points

  • MIPD associated with higher favorable outcomes than craniotomy at 3 and 12 months.
  • In patients with larger hematomas, MIPD demonstrates better outcomes than craniotomy.
  • Retrospective cohort study involving 481 patients with basal ganglia hemorrhage.
  • Neither MIPD nor craniotomy raised mortality risk at short or long-term follow-up.

Cite This Study

Tang et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/692b9d931d383f2b2a379e14https://doi.org/10.57264/cer-2025-0097
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Comparison treatments for basal ganglia hemorrhage: minimally invasive puncture and drainage versus craniotomy versus conservative treatment2025
  2. 2Determining the optimal hematoma volume-based thresholds for surgical and medical strategies in basal ganglia hemorrhage2024
  3. 3Trial of Early Minimally Invasive Removal of Intracerebral Hemorrhage2024 · 437 citations
  4. 4The effect of different surgical methods and timing of surgery on the clinical efficacy in patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage in basal ganglia2024
  5. 5CTA and DTI combined with robot-assisted puncture external drainage improves clinical efficacy for mild basal ganglia haematoma2025