Background: Because of hormonal fluctuations, cyclic mastalgia is a discomfort associated with menstruation. Aim: to assess the effect of PLISSIT model _based counseling on pain, sexual function, and quality of life (QOL) in fertile women with cyclic mastalgia. Research design: a quasi-experimental pretest/posttest research design was conducted. Setting: This study was conducted at the gynecological outpatient clinics at Minia Maternity and Children University Hospital in Minia City. Subjects: a purposive sample of eighty married, fertile women who met the mastalgia criteria, defined as having a pain scale score of at least four. Tools: data were collected via five tools: the structured interview questionnaire, Cardiff pain chart, the Pain Rating Index- scale value (VAS), the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), and the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF questionnaire. Results: there is a statistically significant difference in relation to the impact of the PLISSIT model-based counseling as the number of days with no pain increased from 15.39±1.68 pretest to 27.71±1.25 posttest, and the number of days with severe pain decreased from 8.14±1.96 pretest to 0.40±0.52 posttest(p=0.000**). Additionally, the percentage of women with low sexual activity decreased from (66.3%) pretest, to (0.0%) posttest, and the percentage of women who had high sexual activity increased from (0.0%) pretest to (65.0%) posttest (p <0.001). Furthermore, (67.50%) of the study women had poor quality of life pretest as compared with (97.70%) of them having good quality of life posttest. Conclusion: the PLISSIT model_ based counseling reduced pain, had a curative effect on sexual function, and was effective in correcting these conditions, significantly increasing the overall life quality scores. Recommendation: it's recommended to compare the efficacy of PLISSIT model-based counseling with other counseling and therapeutic models in managing cyclic mastalgia and improving sexual function and quality of life.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohammed et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: