At present, Indonesia's lack of a validated measure for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) presents a barrier to diagnostic and treatment processes. In the current study, the Indonesian Florida Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory (FOCI) was evaluated in terms of its reliability, validity, and optimal cut-off score in predicting OCD presence. Participants comprised 384 adults, including 157 with OCD, 80 case-controls with anxiety or mood disorders, and 147 healthy controls. Assessments included the FOCI, Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory Revised, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7. Test-retest reliability of the FOCI was evaluated over two weeks amongst 30 OCD patients. Internal consistency within OCD samples for the FOCI Symptom Checklist and Severity Scale was strong (Kuder-Richardson 20, KR-20 = .86 and Cronbach Alpha, α = .86), as was test-retest reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, ICC = .98 (95% CI [.95, .99]) and ICC = .73 (95% CI [0.49, 0.86]), respectively). Convergent and discriminant validity were moderate-to-strong. Confirmatory Factor Analysis found a unidimensional factorial structure for the FOCI Severity Scale. A cut-off score of ≥5 optimally predicted OCD with a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 65%. Overall, results support the use of Indonesian FOCI in screening and assessing OCD amongst Indonesian samples.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ticoalu et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: