PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 30, 2024Horticulturae10 citationsOpen Access

Varying Light Intensities Affect Lettuce Growth and Physiology in Controlled Indoor Environments

View Full Paper
AMAndrés Mayorga-GómezUniversity of GeorgiaMIMarc W. van IerselUniversity of GeorgiaRFRhuanito Soranz FerrareziUniversity of Georgia

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Agriculture in controlled environments has gained popularity over time. Compared to traditional agriculture, controlled environments emerge as an alternative to mitigate the negative impacts of conventional farming methods. However, controlled environment agriculture, particularly plant factories with artificial lighting, incurs higher electricity costs, primarily for supplemental lighting and dehumidification of the cultivation area. Given these high costs, it is crucial to understand how efficiently plants utilize available light to convert it into biomass. This understanding can be used to design lighting strategies to reduce electricity usage. In this study, we cultivated ‘Rex’ lettuce (Lactuca sativa) plants on a soilless substrate and used an ebb-and-flow system for irrigation and fertilization. Plants grew in varying photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) levels ranging from 125 to 375 µmol·m−2·s−1 and were assessed for various physiological responses. Our findings revealed that plants exposed to higher light levels exhibited greater final dry weight, increased photosynthetic activity, higher water use efficiency, and accelerated growth compared to those under lower light conditions. Notably, plants subjected to higher light intensities did not show a significant increase in transpiration, suggesting a potential trade-off between energy expenditure on supplemental lighting and dehumidification. This finding opens the possibility of reducing energy consumption for dehumidification and achieving economic savings by subjecting plants to optimal growing conditions for shorter durations. This depends on whether higher savings on dehumidification are achieved compared to the energy required to maintain high PPFD levels.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mayorga-Gómez et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5a3eab6db64358753da3bhttps://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10090931
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Soil compaction impact and modelling. A review2012 · 764 citations
  2. 2Physiological basis of the light use efficiency model1998 · 224 citations
  3. 3Photosynthetic characteristics and growth performance of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) under different light/dark cycles in mini plant factories2020 · 51 citations
  4. 4Gas exchange analysis and chlorophyll a fluorescence in cotyledons of the xan1 sunflower mutant with defects in light energy utilization2005 · 2 citations
  5. 5Growth and Essential Carotenoid Micronutrients in Lemna gibba as a Function of Growth Light Intensity2020 · 63 citations