This research aims to evaluate the accuracy of four intraoral scanner models in full-arch scans. A master model was scanned using a high-precision desktop scanner, and a digital reference model was created. The master model was then scanned ten times by each of the intraoral scanners studied (TRIOS® 3, CEREC OmniCam, iTero™, and Medit i500). The digital models were compared to the master model using 3D measurement software. The analysis revealed significant differences in accuracy among the studied scanners, with the iTero™ scanner showing the best performance (p=0.0003). All scanners exhibited an average discrepancy of less than seventy micrometers in full-arch scans. These findings suggest that while all tested scanners are within clinically acceptable accuracy limits, the iTero™ may offer superior performance for full-arch digital impressions, potentially leading to improved outcomes in extensive dental rehabilitations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lourenço et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: