Background and Study Aims E-scooters, offer an accessible, environmentally friendly and cost-effective travel mode and increasingly popular. However, very little is known about the rider safety. This study aimed to examine injury data to improve understanding of e-scooter-related injuries (to riders themselves and other road users). Methods Emergency Department (ED) data managed by VISU was accessed. Selection criteria included: Cases during July 2021-June 2022; If the 'description of event' text contained terms 'scooter', 'electric', 'e-scooter' and variations/derivatives. Results Demographics: A total of 427 cases presented during the 12-month period. Over half of injured e-scooter riders (57.8%) were young (aged 29 years and younger) and 68 percent were male. Children under 14 years of age were most likely injured when riding privately owned e scooters. Body region: Head/neck injury was the most common region injured (23.2%), followed by extremities (wrist/hand, knee/lower leg and ankle/foot) (33.0%), shoulder and arm (upper arm, elbow & forearm) (22.4%), and multiple body regions (14.8%). Nature of Injury: Fractures represented 34.7% of cases, followed by dislocation and sprain/strain (11.2%) and open wound (11.0%). A substantial proportion were other/unspecified (27.9%). Cause of injury: The majority of riders were injured as a result of falling. In addition, 7% were injured as a result of a collision with a car/van and 6.3% were involved in a transport injury. Only a small proportion of injuries were sustained by other vulnerable road users (pedestrians and cyclists) as a result of an incident with an e-scooter. Discussion Our findings suggest that significant injuries are sustained by e-scooter riders and increasing, resulting in substantial injuries, and most commonly related to a fall from the scooter. The increasing frequency of e-scooter-related trauma and the findings regarding injury characteristic suggest that further research and efforts to improve behaviour, regulation and infrastructure are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oxley et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: