Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Abstract The effects of economic growth on environmental well-being are frequently examined, but it is equally crucial to evaluate the impact of economic downturns. This study aims to address this gap by focusing on Sri Lanka’s export-based apparel manufacturing sector. Due to global concern on climate change and related impacts, there is an urgent need to reduce industry sector emissions of greenhouse gases, including CO₂. The study investigates monthly CO₂ emissions from 2019 to 2022, covering pre-COVID-19 (Jan 2019 - Jan 2020), COVID-19 (Feb 2020 - May 2021), and the economic crisis (Jun 2021 - Dec 2022) periods. Data from six major export-oriented apparel factories were analyzed for their CO₂ emissions, using IPCC (2006) guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. The monthly CO₂ emissions showed a significant disparity across the considered economic periods (χ² = 23.44, p<0.001). Notably, Scope 1 emissions, entailing onsite direct emissions from fuel combustion, witnessed a distinct mean increase of 126% during the economic crisis period (241.47 ± 62.25 t CO₂) compared to the mean COVID-19 period (106.78 ± 40.61 t CO₂, p<0.001) and a 78% rise compared to pre-COVID-19 levels (135.17 ± 30.64 t CO₂, p<0.001). Multiple linear regression on monthly average exchange rates and monthly production revealed a significant impact on monthly emissions (Adj. R² = 0.761, p<0.001), with both factors showing positive influences. The current study highlights the importance of incorporating greener solutions in industries and countries facing similar economic challenges.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dissanayake et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: