We previously published results of a pragmatic randomized trial with 3717 participants in Norway that assessed the effect of wearing glasses on the risk of being infected with SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory infections. Here we present unpublished findings on pre-specified secondary endpoints relying on routinely collected data from Norwegian health registries: Visits to health care providers for any cause (within 21 days), for respiratory symptoms (day 3-28), and for injuries (within 21 days). 1469 participants (39.5%) visited a health care provider for any cause at least once. There was no statistically significant difference between groups, with 39.9.% of participants wearing glasses versus 39.1% in the control group received primary or specialist care (absolute risk difference 0.76%; 95% CI, -2.4% to 3.9%; relative risk 1.02; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.10). Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in visits due to respiratory symptoms (326 participants; 9.1% versus 8.4%; absolute risk difference 0.71%; 95% CI, -1.1% to 2.5%; relative risk 1.08; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.33). There were 3 participants having visited primary or specialist care and having an injury registered in a registry for injuries, the difference between groups not statistically significant. The difference between participants in the proportion of visits for injury related diagnoses was nominally statistically significant (1.3% versus 0.7%; absolute risk difference 0.7%; 95% CI, 0.01% to 1.3%; relative risk 1.94; 95% CI, 1.01 to 3.89). The study underscores the potential of utilizing registry-based outcomes for randomized evaluations of public health measures for infection control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elgersma et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: