Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the chicken femur as a laboratory model for the human metacarpal by comparing the bone microarchitecture and mechanical properties of chicken femurs to human cadaveric metacarpals. Methods: Sixteen fresh chicken femora and 20 fresh frozen cadaveric human metacarpals were imaged using a micro computed tomography scanner. The bones were then mechanically tested using four-point-bending and torsional testing. Results: There were no significant differences in macroscopic features between chicken femora and human metacarpals, including overall length, external radius, internal radius, cortical width and cross-sectional area of the diaphyseal cortex (p > 0.05). There were no significant differences in the trabecular number and spacing in the distal metaphysis of both groups (p > 0.05). The diaphysis and proximal metaphysis did not share any microarchitectural similarities. Four-point bending tests resulted in significantly higher yield forces, ultimate force, failure points and stiffness in human metacarpals (p < 0.05). Torsion tests resulted in significant higher ultimate torque and torsional rigidity in human metacarpals (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The chicken femur has structural and biomechanical differences to the fresh frozen human metacarpal despite the similarity in their macroscopic features.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lobo et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: