More species-rich communities are often assumed to contain more specialist species, typically characterized by narrower niche breadths or smaller ranges.Stronger interspecific competition in species-rich communities is thought to be a key mechanism explaining these patterns.Yet, the relationship between richness and specialization has so far only been studied for a few taxa, and characterizing the effects of interspecific competition on species niches and distributions is challenging.Thus, it remains unclear how general richness-specialization relationships are.Here, we assess relationships between specialization and interspecific competition along richness gradients of bats across four understudied global biodiversity hotspots.Using a novel, integrated species distribution modeling approach that combines expert range maps and occurrence records of 49 bat species, we produced fine-scale distribution and species richness maps, allowing us to assess environmental niche breadth and range sizes.Further, contrasting potential ranges obtained from traditional distribution models with realized ranges obtained through the integration of expert ranges, we assessed range filling and derived indicators of geographic exclusion that characterize how interspecific competition is limiting species' ranges.Our results highlight that the narrowest niche breadths and strongest geographic exclusion occur in species-poor, not species-rich bat communities, in contrast to what was found for other taxa.While niche breadth peaked at intermediate richness, range sizes decreased continuously with richness.These findings show
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oeser et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: